Surgical Billing Specialists Can Cut Through the Red Tape
Medical billers and medical billing services are the financial life blood of a practice. Practices that do not have the right medical billing expertise in their corner can easily lose more than 20 percent of their practice’s potential revenue.
Outsourcing medical billing is growing in popularity as an approach for addressing this tremendous loss of practice income. The range of outsourcing options runs from extremely large organizations to individual freelancers who work from home to provide medical billing services.
Although the complexity of basic medical billing is quite high, it pales in comparison to the complications that come to play for surgical billing. Successful navigation of the payers’ policies and procedures for paying surgery claims requires specialized knowledge that comes from experience with billing for surgeons.
As the cost of providing surgery related healthcare services continues to rise, medical institutions and surgical practices cannot afford to leave revenue uncollected by billing companies or freelancers that are not knowledgeable in surgical billing. It is also important to keep in mind some companies may promote themselves as large surgery billing service providers but in reality they sub-contract the surgery billing to freelancers who work from home. Hiring such companies will lead to lost revenue because of the lack of proper process, controls, and training.
One of the major drawbacks of hiring a company that does not specialize in surgical billing is their lack of familiarity with the procedures and the terminologies used. Even if the medical billing company serves one or two surgeons, they will lack the depth and breadth of expertise required for successful surgery billing. Moreover if the hired company does not specialize in billing for surgeons, then they will not have the expertise to effectively appeal denied claims or answer questions raised by the insurance companies.
Good surgery billing requires the ability to track underpayments. This is more complicated than typical medical billing because of the rules around multiple-procedures. This complication often exceeds the capabilities of the billing software used by generalist billing companies. This is a critical failing since proper pursuit of underpayments can increase a surgeon’s collections by 7 to 10 percent.
The surgery-driven difficulties of medical billing encompass patient billing also. A surgeon’s patient balance process is more challenging because most of the balances are quite sizeable. Coupling this with the difficulties of explaining to a patient their complicated Explanation Of Benefits and the surgical terminology on their bills drives the need for patient collection specialists that have a strong expertise in surgical billing. If patient are not handles with care surgeons will see their patient collections fall and their patient complains rise - not a good combination.
The bottom-line is that is not worth the risk for a surgeon to use a billing company that is not as focused as he or she is on surgery. Just as a patient should not go to a family doctor for surgery, a surgeon should not go to a generalist billing company for medical billing.
Copyright 2008 by Carl Mays II